February 21, 2017 at 6:26 pm #51349
Forewarned of the coming world Eco war the USA is tightening security. The next stage is being prepared. Self sufficiency in oil.February 21, 2017 at 10:30 pm #51350
I like the Idea of Trump and Putin dividing up the middle east , going in and taking it all away from them better .February 22, 2017 at 12:20 am #51351
I like the Idea of Trump and Putin dividing up the middle east , going in and taking it all away from them better .
Who could trust Putin to “play nice” and act like a gentleman with an agreement between himself and Trump? I certainly would not.
Playing nice with Putin and expecting that he’ll keep to agreements is pure fantasyland. Putin will do what’s in Putin’s best interest first, Russia’s a distant second, and lining the pockets of his insider-supporters. Beyond that, “fugedaboutit!” As a friend of ours said suddenly in the middle of a conversation about Ukraine, “PUTIN IS EVIL!” — Oh, did I mention that this person knows eastern Ukraine intimately – having grown up there and only coming to the US well into adulthood? And that the friend speaks Russian as the first language? Of that family members who were unable to get out are still stuck within a short drive of the Russian border, and confirm everything the western media is simply totally unwilling to report about the current death and destruction still going on in that area?
Nope. Brulen’s got it right: “self sufficiency in oil.” Putin wants a lock on his own energy resources, and we simply cannot afford in the US to expect to get our own resources from anywhere other than North America.February 22, 2017 at 1:37 am #51352
Meanwhile, back to the American Civil War:
A week ago, Freedom posted an article about the 30,000 activists already fanned out across the country, along with 250 well-funded offices of the OfA, or Organizing for Action (formerly Obama’s unofficial campaign “committee,” Organizing for America), that could do unlimited fundraising because of its structure. There was never any plan to dismantle it, despite a few stories that were either disinformation, or else wishful thinking based on naive thinking on the part(s) of the media that put them out. The OfA had lots of money after the 2012 campaign, and continued to build (financially and in physical scope), despite the fact that Obama couldn’t be elected to a 3rd term. So why did they do it – hidden in plain sight? Let’s go over this again:
These aren’t typical Black Lives Matter or Occupy Wall Street marchers, but rather professionally trained organizers who go through a six-week training program similar to the training — steeped in Alinsky agitation tactics — Obama received in Chicago when he was a community organizer.
Not only do they have over 30,000 “troops,” they’ve got another 25,000 in training. And again – these aren’t just cannon fodder folks – these are pros, or people professionally trained by the pros.
For a few of us, the patterns are so easily recognizable it would be hilarious – if it wasn’t so serious. This is the 60s and 70s all over again, except it’s far more advanced, with communication and other technologies that simply did not exist almost 50 years ago. Though it isn’t really “communism” (whether upper or lower case “C”), those who understood the so-called communist threat back in the 60s should be recognizing it all over again – just branded as something else (again, labels are smokescreens). It’s a multi-generational struggle, and they use a variety of tactics AND organizations to do their work.
Forget the word “communism” in this context, or that will just garbage up or confuse us as to what’s really going on now. Just understand that what we called communism in the 60s is still in play by any number of other names. But it ain’t communism. It is what’s outlined in the little 3/4 page final chapter of the Manifesto by Karl and Friedrich. I personally choose to call it Marxism due to its origin, but I’m careful with that because most people automatically hear that as just another synonym for “communism,” and the arguments start. Forget the first three regular-sized chapters of the Manifesto (except maybe a little bit at the end of chapter 3). Focus very, very closely on every sentence, even every word at times, in that tight, compact little 3/4 page document called the 4th chapter (or section). That 168 year old document IS the blueprint for today, and on into the future. We’ve seen a few modern updates to it (not changes – just refocusing along the way to accommodate the times), in the form of Cloward and Piven in the late 60s, Uncle Saul in 1971, and finally the “first black President.” If you have any question at all about the deep thinking behind, and power of “community organizing” (lump Alinsky AND Hillary into that term), read Hillary’s political science thesis from 1969.
The plan outlined in 1848 in that 3/4 page document slipped in almost out of sight, is very much alive, very well, and has been proceeding on track now for over 168 years. Those (including some here) who pooh-poohed “just” 30,000 troops, unfortunately missed what those 30,000 troops are all about. They won’t be aiming rifles at us. They are professional disrupters, professional destroyers. They organize the useful idiots that will work for them, get their teeth knocked out at rallies, get arrested and thrown into jail, and possibly even killed. And with those ranks swelling to almost double in the near future, they will be even more powerful. But just for starters, look what happened at the Jason Chaffetz back-home meeting with constituents recently. That scene “coincidentally” was repeated in multiple other locations around the country – by design – and will continue through 26 February, when Congress comes back from yet another “vacation.” The OfA is TRAINING people in these methods and tactics (read the above article on some of that specific training).
Then go back and spend some decent time reading the long – and crucial-to-understand – piece that Malgus provided us 2½ weeks ago. Yes, it’s very long. And yes, as
It is worth your time. Trust me.
Some of us are old enough to remember that era well. Those who aren’t, or who slept through it for whatever reason, are doomed to be taken down by those repeating it – this time on steroids. It’s not about “communism,” “socialism,” “liberalism,” Democrats, Republicans, or any of those smokescreen labels. It’s about two things, and two things only: (1) totalitarianism by a group we can’t even fully identify, and doing that through (2) the forcible destruction of the social and political order – not the wounding or damaging, but destruction. Just contemplate for a moment what it will mean if social order is destroyed, and political order is also destroyed. Selco’s “School” is targeted at exactly that: SHTF.February 22, 2017 at 5:18 pm #51353
You have to wonder if the media being 10 to 1 liberal thinks of itself as the prototype of the communist party in The USA. The party is everywhere, it’s real leaders are hidden behind the elite boardrooms and they run a massive propaganda machine out to destroy the bourgeois. The facts they don’t like they conceal. The clintonista who used their organizing talents became their backbone. If Hillary had become president they would have made her into a Lenin.
And Hillary like any good radical would attempt to destroy the past. She would have pushed the USA into war with Russia. The old system has to be eliminated so there can be no comparison with the new one except in the revised history books. That was one of Stalins rules for radicals and probably Alinskys. Good riddance Common Core.March 4, 2017 at 2:23 pm #51419
Obama using the government apparatus to bug Trump Tower during the election. CCCP democrats.
Snowden right again. The American left is more dangerous than the KGB. They’re waging an electronic insurgency to topple the President of the USA. Obama/Hill locked loaded and ready to roll in cw2 coup the White House drama.March 4, 2017 at 3:12 pm #51420
Here’s an “alternate” American Civil War article I just found. What an amazing piece of ________ (insert your own favorite description). Who knew that Bill and Melinda Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos (Mr. Amazon and now the new Washington Post owner), and others of “the 200 or so richest families in America (The 1 percent who now control 85 percent of the nations wealth and corporate stock),” were actually part of this great white conspiracy called “the Trump Administration and the GOP”!? I guess this just goes to show that rational thinking certainly was not required for the author’s law degree….
White Minority Rule Here to Stay in America, Under the Guise of Patriotism
They will create and carry out a Civil War, if necessary, in order to achieve their aims.
The source of the editorial is also rather ironic, since the piece seems to sing the praises of immigrants. Gee – I thought the whole problem WAS immigrants, according to some ultra-militant Indians! Guess I don’t know nuttin. The civil war is certainly coming from all sides, that’s for sure.March 4, 2017 at 4:53 pm #51422
White minority rule?
Since when were the whites the minority?
Perhaps in LA, Detroit and Chitown, but the rest of the country?March 4, 2017 at 5:19 pm #51423
Since when were the whites the minority?
Oh, I think it’s quite evident that that’s part of the author’s fantasm.
Interestingly though, I went on a quick search to see what the actual numbers are these days, and was more than a little surprised to learn that the Census Bureau has their own definition of “white” that was certainly news to me: “having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa.” I further learned that if people write in their own race on the census form, the following are just some of those counted by the bureaucrats as “white”: Lebanese, Near Easterner, Arab. And that goes into the official statistical reporting of the U.S. population. Frankly, that looks to me like a plot intentionally designed to actually increase immigration of non-whites by calling a number of them “white.” They get to import a bunch of undocumentable “Arabs,” count them as “white” for the total annual numbers, and then turn around and show how “balanced” the immigration is, supposedly mirroring the current U.S. population. What a bunch of Bravo, Hotel, or Delta Sierra!
It’s all a numbers game, for purely political purposes, and it works solely to divide (and conquer). In this case, the author is one of the most nuts individuals I’ve read anything from in a long time – a truly amazing article. And I was truly disappointed that Indian Country Media Network would even waste space with it. They certainly have their militant segment of contributors and editors, but generally they’re rather balanced. This piece of junk is just nuts! But somebody there thinks it was worthy of publication, and there are people who will eat it up – that’s the scary part.
The more I see, the more I see an inevitable American Civil War, though totally unlike the last one. There will not be geographical dividing lines, nor even entirely racial ones. And it will be MUCH more like what Selco experienced and has written about, with the enemy being literally across the alleyway, or in the next block at best, and sometimes even visually indiscernible from one group to the next – thus Selco’s title: ‘SHTF SCHOOL.’March 4, 2017 at 7:24 pm #51426
What unbiased examiner of the facts could honestly conclude that there is not already a low-level war declared by the Left/Deep State against the very concept of a self-governing Republic? The mere fact that they have not bothered to make formal announcement means nothing. That only helps them more easily sneak into killing range.
They are clearly already at war with us. Why not we with them? Of course, to the extent they refrain from overt violence, we must also, not to dishonor our cause. But we are entitled to return “fire” in kind — fact for lie, as it were — to call them out on their BS, and to escalate methods and tactics to meet and exceed, as needed.
March 5, 2017 at 7:42 pm #51434
- This reply was modified 4 years, 1 month ago by L Tecolote.
Bombshell about wire taps. There has to be more than a committee investigation.
A vast difference between saying protestors are out to influence politics and a political party is using professional mercenaries in the streets to beat up opponents in an organized attempt to overthrow the existing government. The evidence shows the democrat position has changed. Obama and the Clintons are enemies of the USA. Just as President Trump believes. He might as well go to Congress and declare that the country has become ungovernable. The democrats are lawless. National emergency.
Wire taps on political candidates in the USA.
Abuse of power by Obama to affect the outcome of an election.
Criminal activities by Clintons revealed and then covered up.
Top officials in the justice dept and Supreme Court exposed as corrupt. Lynch and Ginsberg.
Spys throughout the government leaking sensitive info.
There is no evidence the Russians are attempting to overthrow the U.S. Government.
False democrat propaganda used as distraction by their media activists.
Always the same questions and no answers.March 5, 2017 at 10:26 pm #51441
Demorats Smell Blood in the Water.
Their own. Schumer and Pelosi bleeding lies profusely.
President Trump winning again.
Comey lied. This is bigger than Watergate.
March 6, 2017 at 1:54 am #51444
- This reply was modified 4 years, 1 month ago by Brulen.
These is a great read on what Trump maybe doing http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/03/05/trump-ends-innuendo-game-dealing/
Remember that Trump is a master at playing the news media and the Democrats.March 6, 2017 at 5:05 am #51450
Demo Bats ! Dindu nuffin. The Schumer has hit the fuse. The issue of secret courts in America is going to be aired. What are they. What are the rules of evidence. How did DJT find himself bugged and convicted by the deep state in the media. He’s only the leader of the free world you know.
Nobody special.March 6, 2017 at 5:29 am #51453
Well, I dunno what happened. I posted this previously, made a small edit to it, and it disappeared along with a completely different post. Then when I got an email notification that Brulen’s post (above) had been posted, I clicked on the link, and the entire topic had nothing in it – not a single post. So here goes again:
There is something very, very large here. I found the following article this morning at the top left corner of Drudge, and immediately recognized some very strong elements that weren’t being reported in the on-line reports I’d found thus far (I hadn’t looked at any TV yet). Andrew McCarthy was the federal prosecutor in the 1993 WTC Bombing, and has a strong career behind him – not a man given to just off-the-wall garbage. Read his analysis of this first:
Very shortly after reading that, my wife was checking TV news, and I happened to stop in the family room on my way out to the kitchen. Fox had Newt Gingrich just coming on to discuss the wiretap allegations, and he referenced exactly the same article immediately:
But I didn’t have time to copy any of it, shut down my computer, we turned off the TV, and left the house. This evening, I went looking for the McCarthy article again, and could not even find it in the Drudge archives – even the minute-by-minute archives, for this mornings Drudge Report pages (the archives are NOT owned or controlled by Matt Drudge).
At first, I didn’t think too much about that, but just decided I should be able to find it on Fox News’ web site. I struck out. I could not remember whose show it was on, but looked at all the “important” clips they’ve archived for today on their site – and any interview of Gingrich was not there from this morning.
I also did a search on McCarthy on Google News – generally a VERY good source (if one knows how to use it that way) for finding news articles that aren’t necessarily prominent as major headline articles. I was never able to find the McCarthy article there, either – despite the fact that it’s in a relatively major on line internet “news” site (National Review). If it’s there, I STILL can’t find it. After striking out on my original source for the story (Drudge), then the Gingrich video clip from Fox, and finally on Google News, I began to squirm – I’m reasonably good at on line searching, was certain about what I’d read and watched this morning, yet could find no evidence of the story at all. I could only remember McCarthy’s last name, but my wife suggested trying YouTube (duh!). And there it was. I was then able to find the article as well (above).
I’ve stated often, I don’t like Donald Trump. I didn’t’ want him as my President. But given the alternatives we could vote for, I saw no other alternative. So I’m hoping he can accomplish much of his agenda, regardless of what I think of him personally. And with that, I also see a deeply based, all-out effort to get rid of him, with plenty of
Republican congressmen piling on board to assist the Democrats. And I thought the Republic was in crisis before. Our whole system of government appears to be in the balance currently.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.