Well, well, well…. If this ain’t interesting. Timing is everything, as they say. AFTER the intelligence (?) briefings regarding “Russian” hacking of the DNC were over today,
FBI Says Democrats Refused Access to Hacked E-Mail Servers
The Democratic National Committee rebuffed requests by federal agents to inspect computer servers that had been breached last year during the presidential campaign, forcing them to rely on third-party cyber security data to investigate the hack, the FBI said.
The revelation came hours before U.S. intelligence chiefs are set to brief President-elect Donald Trump on their assessment that Russia was behind the attack.
The Dems were “certain” that the Russians did it! Or so they claimed. But they forced the FBI to go to outside, 3rd party sources for evidence. So just what WAS on those servers – not only in the emails and memos, but in the bowels of the tracking codes – that they wanted to hide?
The DNC denies the FBI ever even asked to examine the servers, but was content to rely on the company the DNC hired to examine the servers (CrowdStrike). If that’s true, the FBI is a bunch of worse-than-amateurs, and/or paid off by the highest bidder. I choose answer “C” – “Both of the above.”
Meanwhile, says the FBI,
“The FBI repeatedly stressed to DNC officials the necessity of obtaining direct access to servers and data, only to be rebuffed until well after the initial compromise had been mitigated,” an FBI official said Thursday, according to BuzzFeed News.
And why did the FBI just now disclose this refusal to assist in the investigation by granting FBI access to the very servers that were allegedly hacked by – somebody? They let the “intelligence” people have their day in front of the cameras, let everybody trash Trump, then quietly announced late in the day the refusal by the Dems to allow access to those very servers. Another set-up of Trump – whether he’s right or wrong, and certainly anything BUT the most transparent administration in history. Forget the Gypsies! “Politicians, tramps, and thieves!”
Whatcha hidin’ Hillary/Barack/Huma/John? And why? What would it REALLY show about the hacking – evidence planted OUTSIDE (for the 3rd party organizations to “find”?)? And/or what MORE would it show that Wikileaks hasn’t already given us?
It stinketh, And it gets interestinger and interestinger….
"Ye hear of wars in far countries, and you say that there will soon be great wars in far countries, but ye know not the hearts of men in your own land."
- This reply was modified 1 year, 6 months ago by GeorgiaSaint.