Profile photo of

Classic examples of the “set up”:

Heavily Armed Conservative Militia Seizes Federal Building in Oregon
Last night members of a conservative militia stormed the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge headquarters in Oregon in protest of the two Oregon ranchers recently convicted on charges of setting fire to federal land.

Several of the protesters hail from the Bundy family – the clan that previously initiated a government standoff in Nevada over similar federal land issues. Among them is Ammon Bundy (Clive Bundy’s son) and two of his brothers. Ryan Payne is also present at the domestic terrorist event. (Payne organized snipers in aiming at federal officials at the Nevada standoff.)



Militia takes over Malheur National Wildlife Refuge headquarters
… The Bundy family of Nevada joined with hard-core militiamen Saturday to take over the headquarters of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge, vowing to occupy the remote federal outpost 30 miles southeast of Burns for years. … Among those joining Bundy in the occupation are Ryan Payne, U.S. Army veteran, and Blaine Cooper. Payne has claimed to have helped organize militia snipers to target federal agents in a standoff last year in Nevada. He told one news organization the federal agents would have been killed had they made the wrong move.


Ammon Bundy himself is not identifying himself or his group with any “militia.” That’s all news media hype. They didn’t “storm” the facility. And the building on the property was not what the media intended for the public image to look like – a big “Murrah Federal Building” style “federal building, suggesting what we were to believe was coming next. The occupiers simply left after the legal protest march in town, and went to the wildlife refuge, and took it over. Peaceful – even according to law enforcement. There is no known evidence of an emphasis on “guns” by the “militants,” just no denial that they may be armed for self-protection. There is absolutely NO evidence that their primary objective is to have a full-on firefight with feds – on the contrary, they’re prepared to OCCUPY the facility long term. It used to be called in previous years (when associated with different racial and political demographics) “civil disobedience.” And note that they got the fact that Ryan Payne is a “U.S. Army veteran,” and that ONE (which one? and where’s Payne’s actual quote, out of his mouth?) news organization said that “federal agents would have been killed had they made the wrong move.” Uh, huh. And what was the rest of that statement, in context (assuming he even said it)?

As said in an earlier post, this is a set up in a well coordinated government/media effort, and when you start drawing the lines of control UPWARD beyond what seems to be the top of those two organizations, you find the real controllers. It’s a giant chess board, and there are multiple moves being made locally, nationally, and internationally. But intentionally isolated focus is on only a few of the moves, in order to keep them from appearing coordinated or even related (e.g. the Oregon incident vs. HR 4269). Once you understand the real tactics and players, it begins to make real sense. And again, it can be traced back to Marx’ statements in the last eight or nine sentences in the last chapter of his Manifesto (the entire chapter only being 3/4 of one page long). Add to that the updated strategy outlined by Cloward and his lovely {choke} bride Frances Fox Piven in 1966, along with Uncle Saul’s 1971 classic 13 “Rules.” Want to really learn more about what Cloward and Piven meant, and accomplished? Check this out:


Now watch the President’s pronouncements over the next couple of weeks on “gun control,” and also listen carefully (if you can stomach it) to the State of the Union speech in a couple of weeks. Then watch Congress and HR 4269, etc. I also predict that many of the Republican candidates will create the appearance of opposition by making all kinds of statements about separation of powers between government branches, the unconstitutionality of executive orders, etc. And they’re right. But what they won’t be telling the public is how they have allowed it to get this far, just like we’re not supposed to know how many of them voted FOR the unconscionable and beyond excessive spending authorized by the latest budget bill we’ve heard so little about.

Oh – and if you want a canary to use as your warning deep down in the explosive environment, watch Utah Representative Mia Love. She came to office saying all the right things (and I honestly believe she meant them). But after being trotted out to speak at the 2012 Republican National Convention, her tone changed perceptibly (but only to those really listening). I think “they got to her.” She lost her 2012 bid for the House. She sounded good enough to finally get elected on her 2nd try (2014). Then sadly, she voted for Paul Ryan as Speaker, and for the December massive spending bill. I think she’s been bought or threatened into submission – a real shame. I think the canary died in its cage.

Yes – “it’s on.” Be careful out there. And be very careful before any action – they WANT to provoke the “wrong” kind of move. It’s a very intricate, complex, and well hidden trap. But it will hurt exquisitely if stepped in.