Whirly,
I don’t agree with your logic. Your supposition is based on a confrontation in the open with both parties in view of each other. Someone in a defensive position inside their bob for instance would probably not be in veiw where an attacker would see what they were wearing. Moving around on the street in day light I can see where your theory might have merit. But really protecting as much of your vitals as posible makes more ssense than leaving them unprotected because you might take a hit in an unprotected area instead Basicly your saying go without body armor and risk a hit to the heart because it’s better than a shot to the head. ????????.
